4 ms·
Better to combat by certainly permanently wrecking someone's life with 20 years in prison.
by MiroF 6y ago
Better to combat by certainly permanently wrecking someone's life with 20 years in prison.
- perl4ever 6y agoI think there's no reason there should be a single person on both sides of the equation, never mind arbitrary choices of the harm scenario. In a contrived utilitarian scenario, you could save 1,000 people and send one to prison, or vice versa.