3 ms·
Well I'd counter it with: > Young people aren’t hanging out in the park right now, Gudberg explains, because they’re in after-school classes in these facilitie
by anotheryou 6y ago
Well I'd counter it with:
> Young people aren’t hanging out in the park right now, Gudberg explains, because they’re in after-school classes in these facilities, or in clubs for music, dance, or art.
> A law was also passed prohibiting children aged between 13 and 16 from being outside after 10 p.m. in winter and midnight in summer.
> not to allow their kids to have unsupervised parties
> Birgir trains five or six times a week; Jón, who is in his first year of a business degree at the University of Iceland, trains five times a week. They both started regular after-school training when they were six years old.
I think key is this sentence though:
> Was there pressure to train when they’d rather have been doing something else? “No, we just had fun playing football,” says Birgir. Jón adds, “We tried it and got used to it, and so we kept on doing it.”
It's certainly up to the parents to make it a really free choice (and up to the state to provide it). Maybe you are right and it's really mainly a good thing :). I hope it is.
- ipnon 6y agoMy point is that unstructured free time itself and parental supervision itself are unrelated to the problem. The solution that Iceland has found is more specific than that, and it is an important distinction.