3 ms·
Good idea in principle, appears to be well executed, but this must not be a service. Just because it can be made into one, it doesn't mean it should be. No rea
by huhtenberg 6y ago
Good idea in principle, appears to be well executed, but this must not be a service. Just because it can be made into one, it doesn't mean it should be.
No reason whatsoever why this can't be a locally hosted offline web app that uses local storage for its state. I can see some people wanting to do their exercises using several devices and for that an optional syncing service would make sense, but adding a permanent online dependency for what is inherently an offline app operating with local data makes zero sense. Even if it were free.