Yes, I think that's an accurate take on the work. At the end of the day, this is primarily a formal result with few direct implications on practical usage. As

Yes, I think that's an accurate take on the work. At the end of the day, this is primarily a formal result with few direct implications on practical usage. As I mentioned in another post, I tried to make it more relatable to an engineering audience, but it's possible that I may have buried the lede somewhat. However, I still stand by the statement that the title is not incorrect, at least if only from a mathematical perspective.