5 ms·
"Because no swabs are required, and no fancy equipment is needed, the tests are less vulnerable to backlogs" That, sadly, is nonsense unless you have thousands
by femto113 6y ago
"Because no swabs are required, and no fancy equipment is needed, the tests are less vulnerable to backlogs"
That, sadly, is nonsense unless you have thousands of technicians available to process the tests. What we have here is a classic latency vs throughput problem. 45 minutes to an answer is a lot better than 24-48 hours which is about the best achievable with the PCR tests. But even if only a third of the 45 minutes is a tech messing with "pipettes, a heating source and an enzyme mixture" and the rest is waiting for reactions at best one tech could do perhaps 30 a day. On the other hand the "fancy equipment" in PCR labs can do thousands of such tests in one go (UW Virology here in Seattle is doing over 5000/day[1]).
[1] http://depts.washington.edu/labmed/covid19/ http://depts.washington.edu/labmed/covid19/
- markus92 6y agoPCR test can be done in a few hours at most. It’s mostly the whole logistical problem that takes time.
- femto113 6y agoYes, the time's not the test, it's getting the sample from where its collected to the lab (e.g. a doctors office that may only get collected from once a day), assembling a batch, running it, collating the results and sending them back out. Any batch-oriented, industrial-scale testing operation will suffer the same delays regardless of the actual process.