3 ms·
Thanks for the feedback. My main aim with this post was just to provide a slightly more accessible introduction to the full work, so I'm glad that it was succes
by gopiandcode 6y ago
Thanks for the feedback. My main aim with this post was just to provide a slightly more accessible introduction to the full work, so I'm glad that it was successful in that sense.
It was mostly just a quick transcription of the corresponding presentation for the paper, so some typos may have crept in. I'll do a second pass and try and fix that later today.
- yomly 6y agoYes - I didn't know what a bloom filter was but found it very easy to follow along and even anticipate where things were going. The diagrams are great too!
- PAPPPmAc 6y agoThat's mostly a really nice explanation, the one thing that bugged me (which is my pet peeve in math-y CS papers) is a not-perfectly-clear explanation of your variables. The ones in the equations interspersed with the diagrams of the original derivation are easy enough to pick up from the diagrams, but you switched from $n$ to $l$ for the number of inputs in the correct expression (and the Bose paper also used $n$, so I'm not sure why).
- gopiandcode 6y agoThanks for the comment. I think that was actually a mistake in my writeup, I just copied the latex from the paper without adjusting it to the notations used in the article. I'll make sure to fix it.