2 ms·
SSH probably could use a much simpler hash based signature than sphincs+ -- e.g. you wouldn't really care if the signature (which is just sent once at connectio
by nullc 6y ago
SSH probably could use a much simpler hash based signature than sphincs+ -- e.g. you wouldn't really care if the signature (which is just sent once at connection time) was 40kbytes.
Nothing in the competition does that. (too bad, because it would also be the fastest algo in the competition to verify and one of the fastest to sign).