4 ms·
The reason that the article doesn't go into that sort of thing is it was written for the general public. I am not expert in this area. I do know that over the y
by woodandsteel 6y ago
The reason that the article doesn't go into that sort of thing is it was written for the general public. I am not expert in this area. I do know that over the years I have read a great many articles for the general public that refer to scientific study of infant-mother interaction. If you are seriously interested, do some research and read up about it.
Let me add that, I do understand that people in the therapy field often make claims that are unsupported by scientific research, and so I can understand that you are suspicious in this case. But this field is different, there is lots of sound research.
- scottlocklin 6y ago>I am not expert in this area > But this field is different, there is lots of sound research. Come on man: pick one. I read the article as you did, and it seems like a big pile of moosh, just as most things in psychology that don't involve large sums of money. If you know something about it: share why I should trust this shit other than "trust me, the non expert." If not; not saying anything is an option.