> neutrality is required in order to have justice. This seems like the opposite of the truth. Surely justice in most cases is looking at a dispute between two

> neutrality is required in order to have justice. This seems like the opposite of the truth. Surely justice in most cases is looking at a dispute between two or more parties and deciding which party is right and which is wrong and to what extent. It’s very much the opposite of neutrality. As a very basic example, neutrality in adjudicating a theft of property is to side with the thief and not demand the return of the property.