4 ms·
Pretty much this — there's a large mindshare bias towards the more dramatic and relatable incidents. My favorite party question is what the most deadly power p
by endymi0n 6y ago
Pretty much this — there's a large mindshare bias towards the more dramatic and relatable incidents.
My favorite party question is what the most deadly power plant accident in history was. And the predictable answer "Chernobyl" is wrong by a whole order of magnitude, which seems to surprise many: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banqiao_Dam https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banqiao_Dam
For even more extreme examples for drama & negativity bias, feel free to have a look at actual death causes vs. news exposure: Terrorism is overrepresented by more than three orders of magnitude, while almost nobody gets killed by a bad guy but rather by heart disease: https://ourworldindata.org/does-the-news-reflect-what-we-die-from https://ourworldindata.org/does-the-news-reflect-what-we-die...
All in all, humans are pretty pathetic at objectiveness.
- jfk13 6y agoIt's a bit of a stretch to refer to Banqiao Dam as a "power plant accident". It was a dam failure. Sure, it was part of "a project to control flooding and provide electrical power generation" (from the wikipedia article), but AIUI the failure was nothing to do with the power plant; it was simply the dam.
- stickfigure 6y agoThat seems overly pedantic, like saying Chernobyl was a "reactor failure" that has nothing to do with the power plant.
- georgiecasey 6y agoI find it much more newsworthy to hear of civilians being purposely killed by people in pursuit of their political aims than a disease where 80% of the deaths are people over 65
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]