4 ms·
I think one of the reasons smarter folks tend to fall into manichean thinking on luck vs. talent is that, as the level of success grows, luck plays a larger and
by recursivedoubts 6y ago
I think one of the reasons smarter folks tend to fall into manichean thinking on luck vs. talent is that, as the level of success grows, luck plays a larger and larger role. So it is an emotionally powerful fact for people competing at the higher end of the success curve.
The mistake is generalizing this proportionality across the entire society and, thus, giving too much weight to luck and not enough to merit.
Discussing luck in the case of billionaires makes a lot of sense.
Discussing luck in the case of a successful franchisee in town makes less sense.
- gotoeleven 6y agoSuccess comes from merit, luck, and corruption in some proportion. In successful countries merit is a larger portion than in unsuccessful countries. When people say the entire concept of merit is %PEJORATIVE BUZZWORD% so we should stop striving for it what they are really saying is they want success to be allocated by luck and corruption and they think the corruption will benefit them.