5 ms·

For more on this, see Olbers’ paradox - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olbers%27_paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olbers%27_paradox

• drran 6y ago
  But, Hubble demonstrates that every line of sight is actually ends on surface of a star or an object, so what is your point?
  • gizmo686 6y ago
    When did Hubble demonstrate that? What the experiment in the article showed is that seemingly empty regions contained stars. If you want to claim that every 1 dimensional line of sight ends on an object, then you need to explain how the cosmic microwave background manages to reach us. Unless, of course, you count quark-gluon plasma as an object; in which case we do pretty much hit a wall in every direction.
    • drran 6y ago
      It looks like your naked sight is much better than Hubble telescope. Congratulations!
      • cambalache 6y ago
        You should read a basic Astronomy book and dont make a fool of yourself here
        • drran 6y ago
          You mean, I should _write_ a book, right?