4 ms·
The organization had an established policy, permitting employer-provided alcohol at work social functions. He pushed a personal view, without the consent of his
by JMTQp8lwXL 6y ago
The organization had an established policy, permitting employer-provided alcohol at work social functions. He pushed a personal view, without the consent of his management, to the maximal extent his role gave him.
- happytoexplain 6y ago>He pushed a personal view, without the consent of his management You should have said this originally. I can understand if this was some crusade he was pursuing, but nobody could infer that from your original post. Also, you should really consider how ironic it is, in a thread about people being afraid to express political opinions, that, when asked how not reimbursing alcohol is political, you responded with a hyperbolic analogy in a sarcastic tone to the effect of "we had this thing called prohibition" (you've since edited that comment, though the tone mostly remains).
- JMTQp8lwXL 6y agoBy stating it "wasn't company policy", I had imagined it was clear it was a personal decision, overriding the rest of the company. I have updated my comment to reflect this.