3 ms·
So what? Unlawful orders are unlawful. The reporter and camera operator were not obstructing anything. They were in a position to observe, which is what the pub
by jessaustin 6y ago
So what? Unlawful orders are unlawful. The reporter and camera operator were not obstructing anything. They were in a position to observe, which is what the public wants them to do. Police will disagree, but police have lied so much that no one believes them anymore.
- kyleee 6y agoWhy is it assumed the order is unlawful?
- jessaustin 6y agoI didn't assume anything. I told you why it was unlawful, in the comment directly above.