3 ms·
> Many people have lost their livelihoods What are you referring to, specifically?
by oisdk 6y ago
> Many people have lost their livelihoods
What are you referring to, specifically?
- pwinnski 6y agoGood question! The phrase "many people" covers up the relative paucity of actual instances, as well as the exact nature of those instances. Every person who loses their job to a misunderstanding is a tragedy to that person, and every person who loses their job claims it's due to a misunderstanding. We live in a polarized nation such that other companies seem to rush to hire those very same people on purpose, so it doesn't seem to be a huge tragedy, but I'm sure it feels tragic. It also seems to happen very, very rarely, and usually after events that seem indefensible on their face. That is, rarely are people willing to say "they should have faced no consequences," but often people are willing to say "they should not have faced consequences quite that severe."
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- sinker 6y agoIf you can't be bothered to recognize even a single instance of this happening, then you've shut your eyes and ears.
- oisdk 6y agoI mean I was interested in examples. People disagree about what counts as a “cancelling” so I was looking to see what the person I was responding to was referring to, with some examples.