>Wikipedia is vastly different from anything I’d normally recognise as news media Agreed - Wikipedia is not news media. Instead it's media fact & opinion aggr

>Wikipedia is vastly different from anything I’d normally recognise as news media Agreed - Wikipedia is not news media. Instead it's media fact & opinion aggregator and editor. It does function as media platform, with content provided by the media and only by the media. The editors' opinions are a secondary consideration; they are obliged by the rules to only ever derive content from the published reliable sources. My "not much different from any other part of the media ecosystem" statement is connected with how the ideas & opinions flowing back and forth between Wikipedia and other medias (as shown in the citogenesis xkcd) - a process that's typical, even characteristic, of media.