3 ms·
> In this article the rights of a photographer was successfully defended The rights of the photographer was respected from the very beginning. The attribution
by waon 6y ago
> In this article the rights of a photographer was successfully defended
The rights of the photographer was respected from the very beginning. The attribution was still there for anyone to see. The “problem” was that it wasn’t included in the thumbnail, because it unsurprisingly didn’t fit in.
> so the system is a least working in some cases
No, this case represents a spectacular failure to protect people’s right to privacy and fair use. Why this is the case is already explained throughout this thread, so I don’t think we need to repeat this here.
- polm23 6y agoJapan has no fair use, which is part of the problem here. Usually people with their rights "infringed" by unauthorized posting on Twitter don't care. If they do care, the poster usually takes the image down. I guess that didn't happen in this case, which is why it went to court, but it rarely gets that far.