3 ms·
What supports that proposition? Plenty supports the opposite, such as Intel causing massive problems for several years e.g. to the MacBook Pro line, with overhe
by mindfulhack 6y ago
What supports that proposition? Plenty supports the opposite, such as Intel causing massive problems for several years e.g. to the MacBook Pro line, with overheating and thermal issues. They've been failing to innovate at the speed Apple would otherwise be able to, for a long time now.
- posix_me_less 6y ago> "Intel causing massive problems for several years e.g. to the MacBook Pro line, with overheating and thermal issues." Do you not realize how ridiculous this statement is? Apple knows what CPU models are going into their laptops, they could properly design hardware and software to prevent overheating and degradation.
- rowanG077 6y agoThey could. But that means the macbook pro would perform worse on all the superficial benchmarks.
- pier25 6y agoThere are plenty of arguments, but E2E control is probably the strongest one. It's not only about CPUs. Remember Nvidiagate or Radeongate? If Apple takes full control of the hardware like they did with iPhone/iPad/Watch they will (most likely) end up making better products. But also: - Single architecture on all their products - More perf per watt