3 ms·
I don't think that's a contradiction, I think you and Twitter have different understandings of what the size of a "limited group of employees" is. The usual adv
by akersten 6y ago
I don't think that's a contradiction, I think you and Twitter have different understandings of what the size of a "limited group of employees" is. The usual advice of dismissing nebulous corporate statements like that applies.
Anyway, even if they had provided a figure, I think you're taking it out of context - the quote says access to "sensitive account information" is limited, not access to account recovery options. So it's potentially someone outside of that limited group whose credentials were compromised.
- bigiain 6y ago<cynical view> I think the misunderstanding is over the phrase "sensitive account information". I notice it wasn't Nestle or Verizon or Disney or Heinz or Unilever accounts that got hacked. You know, the information about "accounts". The records of monetary transactions. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1094351/us-twitter-advertisers-ranked-by-impressions/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/1094351/us-twitter-adver...