4 ms·
>As I said before, that's a difference in a million potential deaths in the United States. So? In the larger scale is not a big number and doesn't justify the
by matz1 6y ago
>As I said before, that's a difference in a million potential deaths in the United States.
So? In the larger scale is not a big number and doesn't justify the lockdown
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30208-X/fulltext https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5...
"full lockdowns and widespread testing were not associated with reduced COVID-19 mortality"
>. In addition you presented that 0.04% as somehow in agreement with the estimates
Yes the estimates 0.65, the number right now is 0.04, its a lot better, its good news.
- SketchySeaBeast 6y agoYou're celebrating a number that means nothing. It's saying "we only had 50 casualties!" the first day of world war 2 and assuming that's a victory and indicative of how the rest will go.
- matz1 6y ago145k death is not a first day number is accumulation after about 4 months. We can also from other country such as sweeden, they don't have lockdown, their death rate is declining and the total death is more or less the same with other country.