4 ms·

True, but if you were remote only, you could live in a low cost place and afford a bigger space.

• mynegation 6y ago
  I could but I just do not want to. This pandemic definitely stacked the cards against my living preferences
• Andrew_nenakhov 6y ago
  The place is chosen not only for the cost. Some people like to live near the park, or downtown, because theaters museums movies bars dancehalls are all there.
  • sethhochberg 6y ago
    Those of us who genuinely prefer city living and amenities seem to be relatively few among the crowd on HN. I used to work full-time remote, and had the choice to go anywhere I wanted in the world. I still landed in NYC, and stayed because I loved a diverse, walkable community with amazing nightlife, culture, and parks all around. I eventually took a job in an office in the city because I liked having an occasional social environment with coworkers, both in the office and outside of it. Working at home full-time as a person without a family and more social needs than I was willing to admit for a long time was extremely isolating, but I don't want a family yet. I'm eager to go back to the office as soon as it is safe at scale for all the same reasons I was eager to leave my remote job and go into an office again most days originally. Moving somewhere cheap and more isolated to have more space to work at home is about the lowest thing on my priority list. (But I recognize that I'm fortunate to work at a place which always had pretty good tolerance for remote work, even pre-pandemic, even if I didn't take advantage of it... and also lucky to have coworkers who I generally enjoy being around and working with.)
• Zitrax 6y ago
  If that fits the rest of the family. Moving around is easier if you are alone.