5 ms·
because no party has ever represented them, only pandered. the affiliation assumptions aren't as strong as people are led to believe, I would say nonexistent.
by vmception 6y ago
because no party has ever represented them, only pandered. the affiliation assumptions aren't as strong as people are led to believe, I would say nonexistent.
- malwarebytess 6y agoBlanket statements like these are impolitic at best, and utterly wrong at worst.
- vmception 6y agobut more closer to 50% since literally half of the people don’t openly espouse verbatim party line beliefs and dont want people to know, while a much greater percent of the subset that bothers/is enfranchised to vote sticks with one party Reinforcing an assumption, useful for pandering, while with this information another approach could be possible
- dragonwriter 6y ago> because no party has ever represented them, only pandered. the affiliation assumptions aren't as strong as people are led to believe, From a different item of the same piece, Black Democrats are less likely than White Democrats to prefer compromise with Republicans. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/02/27/5-facts-about-black-democrats/ft_20-02-26_factsblackvoters_03/ https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/02/27/5-facts-abo...
- vmception 6y agoand regarding the two third of Latino Americans?