You are connecting the actions of the CEO with the actions of the company. I am making a point about the culture of a company that actively promotes themselves

You are connecting the actions of the CEO with the actions of the company. I am making a point about the culture of a company that actively promotes themselves with sexist advertising campaigns. They are free to do as they wish and I am free to suggest that supporting a company that promotes themselves in this manner is also supporting the attitude in our culture that 'women==objects for our amusement' and is rewarding them for adopting that attitude for profit. [addressing a sibling comment] Yes, the actors in the ads are willing participants...and that matters why? One useful way we have of responding to corporations is by not participating in their activity if we do not agree with them. And yet, this ability is horribly underused. Don't like sexism? Don't support companies that rely on it. Don't like violence? Don't support companies that participate in it? I just find it interesting where people draw the lines.