3 ms·

so in may it was 0.4 and now its 0.65 is worse but still very low. the number is of course evolving but unlikely to widely different than that. >Do you believe

by matz1 6y ago

so in may it was 0.4 and now its 0.65 is worse but still very low. the number is of course evolving but unlikely to widely different than that. >Do you believe this gives you lee-way to diminish and share bad facts to bolster your claim? What bad facts ?

SketchySeaBeast 6y ago
> so in may it was 0.4 and now its 0.65 is worse but still very low. the number is of course evolving but unlikely to widely different than that. As I said before, that's a difference in a million potential deaths in the United States. > What bad facts ? You presented the death rate of the whole of the united states as being somehow indicative of the situation, when you were aware that that's an order of magnitude decrease from the projections for the United States. In addition you presented that 0.04% as somehow in agreement with the estimates " Inline with what has been estimated by most research publication."
- matz1 6y ago
  >As I said before, that's a difference in a million potential deaths in the United States. So? In the larger scale is not a big number and doesn't justify the lockdown https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30208-X/fulltext https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5... "full lockdowns and widespread testing were not associated with reduced COVID-19 mortality" >. In addition you presented that 0.04% as somehow in agreement with the estimates Yes the estimates 0.65, the number right now is 0.04, its a lot better, its good news.
  - SketchySeaBeast 6y ago
    You're celebrating a number that means nothing. It's saying "we only had 50 casualties!" the first day of world war 2 and assuming that's a victory and indicative of how the rest will go.
    - matz1 6y ago
      145k death is not a first day number is accumulation after about 4 months. We can also from other country such as sweeden, they don't have lockdown, their death rate is declining and the total death is more or less the same with other country.

by matz1 6y ago

SketchySeaBeast 6y ago

> so in may it was 0.4 and now its 0.65 is worse but still very low. the number is of course evolving but unlikely to widely different than that. As I said before, that's a difference in a million potential deaths in the United States. > What bad facts ? You presented the death rate of the whole of the united states as being somehow indicative of the situation, when you were aware that that's an order of magnitude decrease from the projections for the United States. In addition you presented that 0.04% as somehow in agreement with the estimates " Inline with what has been estimated by most research publication."

matz1 6y ago
>As I said before, that's a difference in a million potential deaths in the United States. So? In the larger scale is not a big number and doesn't justify the lockdown https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30208-X/fulltext https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5... "full lockdowns and widespread testing were not associated with reduced COVID-19 mortality" >. In addition you presented that 0.04% as somehow in agreement with the estimates Yes the estimates 0.65, the number right now is 0.04, its a lot better, its good news.
- SketchySeaBeast 6y ago
  You're celebrating a number that means nothing. It's saying "we only had 50 casualties!" the first day of world war 2 and assuming that's a victory and indicative of how the rest will go.
  - matz1 6y ago
    145k death is not a first day number is accumulation after about 4 months. We can also from other country such as sweeden, they don't have lockdown, their death rate is declining and the total death is more or less the same with other country.