3 ms·
If you're using delayedjob, I strongly suggest you check out the Performance table in Sidekiq's readme. 465 seconds for DelayedJob against 14 seconds for Sideki
by pqdbr 6y ago
If you're using delayedjob, I strongly suggest you check out the Performance table in Sidekiq's readme. 465 seconds for DelayedJob against 14 seconds for Sidekiq for the same workload.
It's 7100 jobs/sec x 215 jobs/sec.
I wonder how GoodJob will compare.
https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq#performance https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq#performance
- mbell 6y agoThat benchmark is just showing job overhead. That Sidekiq can do nothing 7100 times a second only matters when overhead is significant, i.e. when your jobs do almost nothing.