4 ms·

i'm not sure why i should use this instead of delayed job for instance

• pqdbr 6y ago
  If you're using delayedjob, I strongly suggest you check out the Performance table in Sidekiq's readme. 465 seconds for DelayedJob against 14 seconds for Sidekiq for the same workload. It's 7100 jobs/sec x 215 jobs/sec. I wonder how GoodJob will compare. https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq#performance https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq#performance
  • mbell 6y ago
    That benchmark is just showing job overhead. That Sidekiq can do nothing 7100 times a second only matters when overhead is significant, i.e. when your jobs do almost nothing.
• thibaut_barrere 6y ago
  delayed_job hasn't seen a release in 1 year, if that matters to you https://rubygems.org/gems/delayed_job/ https://rubygems.org/gems/delayed_job/