You just ignored the science in front of you and assumed countries like Sweden was because of the lock downs. When the maths doesn't add up. I don't think you e

You just ignored the science in front of you and assumed countries like Sweden was because of the lock downs. When the maths doesn't add up. I don't think you even read my comment nor the paper as I didn't mention cases but mortality. If lock down is a reactionary process to cases then the different types of lock down should change the mortality. Sweden, New York and UK are easily explained if look at the age range and location of deaths. It was the reaction of sending sick patients out to care homes. Bringing up Sweden, you just cherry picked only it's Nordic neighbours, but it compares quite well, and normal, with the other European countries. If you look at the previous flu seasons for the Nordic countries you will see that Sweden had a few years of very low deaths, whilst the countries you cherry picked had a few years of high death. So Sweden's care homes were packed with more vulnerable people. Prisons also further support the t-cell theory. People in prison don't get enough sunlight and vitamin-D, reducing their t-cell immunity. Also they are heavily weighted towards minorities who are more susceptible. And since coronovirus are quite seasonal usually, and t-cell response changes with season, it's why we are seeing different cycles for the northern hemisphere, the southern hemisphere and the equatorial regions. USA is a big country, the northern states got hit first and now the southern states are matching the regions like Mexico. USA is so big you need to treat each state like it's own region and not generalise.