> This is an interesting concept, but I think the researcher put too much personal bias in their choice of songs. For example, there are some very conspicuous o

> This is an interesting concept, but I think the researcher put too much personal bias in their choice of songs. For example, there are some very conspicuous omissions from the list: no Nirvana, no Foo Fighters, no Linkin Park, no Jay Z, no No Doubt. These are some of the most iconic musicians from the 90s. It's garbage in, garbage out. They should have sanity tested their song selections before they started collecting data. And even if they wanted to stick with an "unbiased" criteria like peak chart position, with 2,925,295 data points, they could have probably broadened the criteria to account for some of the problems.