3 ms·
There is no reason, except if you don't invest to have enough bandwidth for your users, which you shouldn't have a problem with, given the available technology.
by shmerl 6y ago
There is no reason, except if you don't invest to have enough bandwidth for your users, which you shouldn't have a problem with, given the available technology. So again, it's not a technical issue. No need to be a cheapskate and excuse it with "wastefulness". Available bandwidth is growing faster than what you can use.
- _hl_ 6y agoYes, there is also no reason why I don’t have a personal road built from my house to my workplace reserved solely for me, it’s only a matter of investment. Almost nobody needs that investment, and if you’re going to lay more fibre, you’re better off providing even more downlink capacity.
- shmerl 6y agoAvailable bandwidth still grows faster than what you can use. So there is no reason not to provide symmetrical bandwidth. And price of that bandwidth is also only going down.