3 ms·
Wait. You're right. I did a double-take then doubted myself. I can't find anything historical that used 3.2kHz memory access speeds, but I'm pretty sure there
by exikyut 6y ago
Wait. You're right. I did a double-take then doubted myself.
I can't find anything historical that used 3.2kHz memory access speeds, but I'm pretty sure there was something out there... from the 1960s.
- cardinalfang 6y agoThat speed is slower than magnetic memory; it could be delay-line memory, which would be even earlier.