3 ms·
A much more realistic and accurate take on the tech than the article. One combination that can work is to have GPT3 with an unskilled human judge in the loop. T
by innagadadavida 6y ago
A much more realistic and accurate take on the tech than the article. One combination that can work is to have GPT3 with an unskilled human judge in the loop. The human can discriminate with common sense while the machine generates good jargon with correct grammar.
- mattkrause 6y agoThat seems even worse! Jargon (sometimes) isn't just obfuscation; it carries important shades of meaning that would be tedious to spell out every time. 'Homicide' and 'murder', for example, are sometimes used interchangeably, but are not actually legally interchangeable. You would not want your involuntary manslaughter plea upgraded to murder, a more serious--and therefore more severely punished offense. You could, of course, try to train "unskilled labor" to detect things like that. By the time you are done, the labor won't be unskilled and you will have reinvented the paralegal.
- solidasparagus 6y agoYeah, I think those will be some of the first wave of language generation applications. Stuff like Buzzfeed but without as many writers because the language model is generating potential articles and the humans pick which are good (and maybe clean them up). Similarly, disinformation or noise attacks on social media - with just a few people overseeing the language model as it generates potential posts/replies.