23 ms·
It is a bit like face recognition databases. In principle, the data is already public-enough. In practice, building these databases enables qualitatively higher
by ivalm 6y ago
It is a bit like face recognition databases. In principle, the data is already public-enough. In practice, building these databases enables qualitatively higher levels of surveillance.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- est31 6y agoDefinitely agree. The point I'm trying to make is that DNA is a bit more "private" than your face, as there is a nontrivial cost to sequence it, but in general it's the same level. One day we'll be able to read thoughts and I'm pretty sure that some folks will build thought databases and people might even share their thoughts with the public... and ad companies will love it because they love checking the reactions of people to ads.
- jeffbee 6y agoHow, exactly? It's not like I can use wide-area instrumentation to locate you via your genome. You can imagine how to do it with cameras and faces, but I just don't see the method for DNA.
- throwawayDNA 6y agoImagine the BLM protests (since that will probably be popular with the HN crowd). There’s video footage of a guy in a mask spitting on the ground after throwing a rock. He’s wearing a mask. His second cousin did 23 and me. Actually, statistically many of his second cousins did 23 and me. Therefore we know who he is. If only one second cousin did 23 and me, we’ve narrowed the suspects to, perhaps, a few hundred. Filter by apparent height, gender and you have a very narrow set of suspects.