3 ms·
Yep. One way to view automation with machine vision / perception is that it can cover ~85-95% of the true positives. You're still going to get false positives
by three_seagrass 6y ago
Yep. One way to view automation with machine vision / perception is that it can cover ~85-95% of the true positives.
You're still going to get false positives and false negatives that need human review, and at a scale of Facebook, that's a lot of humans.
- msapaydin 6y agoI am just hoping that those currently uncovered cases will be "milder or more nuanced" cases that will be less damaging to the psyche of human moderators and will, once labeled correctly, improve the coverage rate of automated moderators.