3 ms·
It has been. Most of these sites catch a ton of images and video automatically when they are similar enough to prior known content. That doesn't matter from a
by nitwit005 6y ago
It has been. Most of these sites catch a ton of images and video automatically when they are similar enough to prior known content.
That doesn't matter from a staff point of view though. You have a queue to work through. You'll be putting in an 8 hour day dealing with the stuff the system doesn't catch. The automation just means they don't need as much staff.
- three_seagrass 6y agoYep. One way to view automation with machine vision / perception is that it can cover ~85-95% of the true positives. You're still going to get false positives and false negatives that need human review, and at a scale of Facebook, that's a lot of humans.
- msapaydin 6y agoI am just hoping that those currently uncovered cases will be "milder or more nuanced" cases that will be less damaging to the psyche of human moderators and will, once labeled correctly, improve the coverage rate of automated moderators.