3 ms·
> If a human's neural network can correctly correlate the before/after examples, so can a computer's. color _me_ skeptical, but this is like saying we have fun
by DabbyDabberson 6y ago
> If a human's neural network can correctly correlate the before/after examples, so can a computer's.
color _me_ skeptical, but
this is like saying we have functioning AGI; that artificial NNs are the same as the ones we have in our skulls. This to me, is an effect of the over-anthropomorphization of machine learning. It's a bad intuition to have.
However, I do agree. This is just one step in an arms race, and one iteration from being worthless.
- akersten 6y agoThat bit was more of a forward-looking statement about the future capabilities of image recognition, but yes it is somewhat hyperbolic in the general case. I don't believe we'll ever achieve AGI, but I do believe we'll have super reliable application-specific classifiers that vastly outperform humans and won't be fooled by tricks like this.
- azernik 6y agoMachine vision will likely be one of the last of these, though; the visual cortex is a pretty large chunk of very sophisticated hardware.