I'd think that assuming knowledge of the seeds isn't an interesting question from the perspective of the player. To me the much more interesting question, and w

I'd think that assuming knowledge of the seeds isn't an interesting question from the perspective of the player. To me the much more interesting question, and what I presume 1 is asking, would be "Assuming true randomness, is there are strategy that achieves 100% win rate in slay the spire." (True randomness meaning ignore pseudorandomness and assume that if the game makes something happens 5% of the time, it could do so from any valid starting state.) Really what the question is asking is is there a strategy that for any theoretically valid game of slay the spire would, if followed, result in a win. Given that the article did prove that there are theoretically unwinnable seeds with A20 silent, the answer is definitely not that am optimal player could win 100% of the time on all rule sets. Does change the question to "For a given StS rule set, what is the winrate the maximally efficient strategy would achieve."