14 ms·
Yep, that's why I suggested the biometric ID. But I agree, it's dystopian. I think such a system would encourage the development of two parallel webs: the abov
by gen220 6y ago
Yep, that's why I suggested the biometric ID. But I agree, it's dystopian.
I think such a system would encourage the development of two parallel webs: the above-ground, requires-ID-for-every-http-request web (Facebook, Amazon), and a somewhat shadier, sometimes-or-never-requires-ID-except-in-exceptional-circumstances internet.
Kind of like how bars and grocery stores are supposed to verify your age, but many don't. Or kind of like how there's large swathes of the country where people drive around without driver's licenses or insurance, and it isn't an issue unless they end up in an accident.
- Avamander 6y agoThe "shadier" internet will be slowly killed. Without any doubt. It would just be more convenient for website hosts, to people in power in general. Especially so under oppressive regimes, I think China has already displayed how internet would end up if we went that route. Restrictive, dangerous for dissidents, without any real privacy.