4 ms·
Nope, that's completely wrong. A new proof of a known theorem has to pretty damn cool to be publishable. It is much easier to publish theorems that were not pre
by omaranto 6y ago
Nope, that's completely wrong. A new proof of a known theorem has to pretty damn cool to be publishable. It is much easier to publish theorems that were not previously known and the result is that most research papers are about new theorems not new proofs of old theorems.
I wish it were actually a little easier to get a new proof of a known result published.
- webmaven 6y agoHuh. Seems like that would be a viable (indeed, valued and interesting) niche for a mathematics journal.