Constitutional changes have to be ratified by at least 3/4 of the states so not really under federal government, unless the states buy-in as well. Of course it

Constitutional changes have to be ratified by at least 3/4 of the states so not really under federal government, unless the states buy-in as well. Of course it is lack of political will to make changes that is always the problem. In this case there is no intent as well. It is like congress voting its own salary? It took 202 years to pass the 27th Amendment after all and it has the just most basic of safeguards on compensation. The legislation governing legislators such as election laws, salary, term limits etc should not be controlled by them, this is a major flaw in many democratic systems.