3 ms·

I've been following "Q" out of curiosity since when it started posting. Not sure if it's a pied piper op, as Wikileaks said, or something else. However I've n

I've been following "Q" out of curiosity since when it started posting. Not sure if it's a pied piper op, as Wikileaks said, or something else. However I've not seen any of the things you listed as examples of hateful content. You can search all the posts yourself. "Chrissy Teigen" and "Hanks" show no results. Clinton is mentioned but none of the "cutting off her face" stuff. Where did you get these ideas? https://qposts.online/?q=Teigen&s=keyword https://qposts.online/?q=Teigen&s=keyword

hnzix 6y ago
I've seen this Q garbage in friends' Facebook feeds, where it is being amplified by wellness gurus of all things. The posts are word salad fever dreams claiming certain celebs are literally satanic and practicing witchcraft and ritually murdering children. A depressing number of people swallow it. We haven't evolved enough since Salem.
djur 6y ago
"QAnon" is the community of people who subscribe to the idea that "Q" is leading them to some hidden truth. I got these ideas by seeing thousands of people identifying as QAnon followers express every one of the ideas I listed above. You just have to look at any one of those famous people's tweets to see QAnon replies baselessly accusing them of horrible things. The codeword used for the supposed Clinton video in QAnon is "frazzledrip". The nature of "Q", or at least the current person publishing under that guise (likely Jim and/or Ron Watkins), is that they rarely make any kind of concrete claims or predictions, but they've certainly made allusions to Moloch, Satan, cannibalism, etc. when referring to political figures. It's the responsibility of "bakers" in the community to take "Q"'s "crumbs" and come to conclusions. Certainly these conclusions have been widespread in the community for years and have not been spoken against by "Q".
- bluedispatcher 6y ago
  By this logic Twitter should also ban all Muslims because there are extremists who call for the death of infidels. Instead it's far more reasonable to just crack down on hate speech and harassment in general, which I would have assumed they already did.

hnzix 6y ago

I've seen this Q garbage in friends' Facebook feeds, where it is being amplified by wellness gurus of all things. The posts are word salad fever dreams claiming certain celebs are literally satanic and practicing witchcraft and ritually murdering children. A depressing number of people swallow it. We haven't evolved enough since Salem.

djur 6y ago

"QAnon" is the community of people who subscribe to the idea that "Q" is leading them to some hidden truth. I got these ideas by seeing thousands of people identifying as QAnon followers express every one of the ideas I listed above. You just have to look at any one of those famous people's tweets to see QAnon replies baselessly accusing them of horrible things. The codeword used for the supposed Clinton video in QAnon is "frazzledrip". The nature of "Q", or at least the current person publishing under that guise (likely Jim and/or Ron Watkins), is that they rarely make any kind of concrete claims or predictions, but they've certainly made allusions to Moloch, Satan, cannibalism, etc. when referring to political figures. It's the responsibility of "bakers" in the community to take "Q"'s "crumbs" and come to conclusions. Certainly these conclusions have been widespread in the community for years and have not been spoken against by "Q".

bluedispatcher 6y ago
By this logic Twitter should also ban all Muslims because there are extremists who call for the death of infidels. Instead it's far more reasonable to just crack down on hate speech and harassment in general, which I would have assumed they already did.