24 ms·
It's not read-mode-level, but I've always liked Dillo (https://www.dillo.org/ https://www.dillo.org/) for its sheer speed with acceptable design. It's only rend
by rakoo 6y ago
It's not read-mode-level, but I've always liked Dillo (https://www.dillo.org/ https://www.dillo.org/) for its sheer speed with acceptable design. It's only rendering HTML with CSS, and that is enough for a vast majority of cases.
- MayeulC 6y agoI really like Dillo, it's my main browser on an old computer I still use. It feels very fast. However, it has some issues with SSL. Can you click trough duckduckgo results, for instance? I also miss a slightly more useable interface for bookmarks. And touch compatibility (to use it on my PinePhone). I really like the js-free experience. I've also used elinks in the past, zimbra works quite well with it, and pressing F4 to edit my emails in vim is a breeze :)
- anthk 6y agoCompile dillo from mercurial (hg clone hg.dillo.org/dillo dillo, cd dillo, ./configure --enable-ipv6 --enable-ssl, make, sudo make install) and then edit ~/.dillo/dillorc so it looks like: DEFAULT DENY .domain.foo ACCEPT .domain.foo ACCEPT_SESSION
- badsectoracula 6y agoYou may also want to try out NetSurf, it is another lightweight browser but i think it has better support for HTML+CSS than Dillo.