3 ms·
I haven't, unfortunately, but it looks promising from just looking into it briefly. Open source monitoring is always an area that needs more competition.
by hnarn 6y ago
I haven't, unfortunately, but it looks promising from just looking into it briefly. Open source monitoring is always an area that needs more competition.
- Twirrim 6y agoZabbix has been around for quite a long time. Easily 15 years now. I haven't looked at it since around 2013, but at the time it was placing quite some pressure on a mysql db backend. It looks like they've expanded out to support more than MySQL as the back-end these days.
- k-rus 6y agoI noticed that Zabbix supports PostgreSQL and TimescaleDB as back-ends and just checked the list, which contains also Oracle and SQLite (DB2 support is experimental).
- znpy 6y agoZabbix has been growing A LOT lately, and in a good way. It's nice to see this king of projects evolving Una good direction instead of stagnating and the diying.
- Twirrim 6y agoIt's great to hear. I liked zabbix in general. At the time of its initial surge in popularity, nginx and cacti were the dominant force in monitoring. Zabbix was a little quirky to get used to, but a breath of fresh air.
- orev 6y agoI find the problem with monitoring is not a lack of options, but an overwhelming abundance of them. It’s almost impossible to evaluate all of them realistically, so you just wind up using the most popular one.