A long time ago I was observing court cases for a school project. In one of the cases the prosecution was interviewing one of the arresting officers. The offi

A long time ago I was observing court cases for a school project. In one of the cases the prosecution was interviewing one of the arresting officers. The officer stated "While survailing the subject we noticed he became increasingly paranoid that he was being watched, most likely from his heavy cocain use" The judge had to correct him that because of the fact he was being watched by the officer, it was not parinoia. All the points in this article are good, I just wish they didn't get so specific about particular theories and then just dismiss them as debunked over and over. Just because you say they have been debunked in the article doesn't make it so or convince anyone who believes in the theory. I find the media, on both left and right tend to do this far too often, far better to lay out the facts and or logic for the argument you're trying to make.