4 ms·

This post should be removed. Clearly spam.

• tlrobinson 18y ago
  It's not spam (or at least I didn't intend for it to be spam). I just found it interesting that it's worth it for lawyers to pay so much for these search terms. Perhaps I should have posted the article I found this through: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/15/us/15bar.html http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/15/us/15bar.html
  • petercooper 18y ago
    Unfortunately the page itself links to lots of internal pages which are broken but clearly designed to trick the search engines (if the PHP scripts worked properly).
  • coglethorpe 18y ago
    For what it's worth, I thought the article was pretty informative. It turns out that lawyers can pay a lot for this particular kind of case because asbestos is about the only cause of that kind of cancer. The lawyer just gets a settlement with parties rather than litigating for years.