2 ms·
Sure, that's what you want. I would argue that people want a more traditional app instead, with what I'm sure you'd consider a bloated and inefficient GUI. Con
by mynameisvlad 6y ago
Sure, that's what you want.
I would argue that people want a more traditional app instead, with what I'm sure you'd consider a bloated and inefficient GUI. Considering that most people don't even know what a terminal even is, and that form regularly trumps functionality in day-to-day lives.
- deadbunny 6y agoThen they already have multiple options for them to chose from...
- mynameisvlad 6y agoThe parent comment is implying that people don't want "pretty apps" and want simple functional apps like this exclusively. I am arguing that what the parent commenter wants is valid, but is likely not what the general population wants. In that respect, not sure how exactly your comment is relevant.
- dllthomas 6y agoI don't think the parent comment was speaking for anyone but themselves. They expressed a preference, it was rejected as opposed to "progress". The comment about progress being giving people what they want was a refutation of that - like, "it can't be progress for me if it's not what I want." The fact that other people may want what they've been given is great - for them, progress! but it's also irrelevant to the point being picked at. Perhaps I'm being overly charitable to the original commenter.