Sometimes the continuation makes sense, but this is just by chance. It's just nonsense text in the style of the original. There's nothing that prevents internal

Sometimes the continuation makes sense, but this is just by chance. It's just nonsense text in the style of the original. There's nothing that prevents internal contradictions. It's just that often these will be absent by chance, or because the output contains regurgitated chunks of coherent text written by humans. OpenAI are, like most AI researchers, utterly shameless in encouraging overinterpretation and wishful thinking.