3 ms·

I found it quite hard to decipher the original images the FBI provided.. So I pulled them into Photoshop converted them to Grey-scale and ran them through a Gen

I found it quite hard to decipher the original images the FBI provided.. So I pulled them into Photoshop converted them to Grey-scale and ran them through a Genuine Fractals routine and mathematically increased the resolution by 700% without losing any image quality, then I filtered them 3 times with some unsharp masking, to bring out some hidden details, finally I inverted the colors which makes several characters that were unrecognizable before appear.. especially on the 2nd page where the smudging is. The files are 8 mb in size and I have it in both regular and inverted format. Inverted View http://www.mediafire.com/i/?f5zukpyfsjdct5s http://www.mediafire.com/i/?f5zukpyfsjdct5s Enlarged Regular View http://www.mediafire.com/i/?84z1owcxf52ktmc http://www.mediafire.com/i/?84z1owcxf52ktmc

thinkalone 16y ago
Pretty cool - it definitely helps to read things better, although it actually resulted in me removing more characters from my transcription! After seeing them more clearly, I was less confident to make a judgment on which letter they may be. I'll include my transcription below. I've marked questionable characters with an asterisk, and the circled sections are enclosed in square brackets: Document 1 - P1 (MND MK NE* RSE-N-S-*-KNARE) (ACSM) *TFRNE NP*NSE NPBSE RCBBNSE NPRSE 1NC PRSE NM*SE *PREHLD WLDNCBE(TFXL* TCXL NCBE) AL-*RPPIT XLYPPIY NCBE M*KSEWCD RCBR NSE PRSE WLDRCBRNSE NT **NE*T*SE-CRSLE-CITRSE WLDNCBE ALWCPNCBETSME LRSE RLSE UR GLSNE AS N WLDNCBE (NOPFSE NLSRE NCBE) NTE GDDMNSENCURERCBRNE (TENE TFRNE NCBRTSENCBE 1NC) (FLRSE PRSE ONDE 71 NCBE) (CDNSE PRSE ONS*E 74 NCBE) (PR+SE PRSE ONREDE 75 NCBE) (TF N*CMSP SOLE MRDE LUSE TOTE WLD*WLDNCBE) (194 WLD'S NCBE)(TRFXL) Document 2 - NOTES [ ALPNTE GLSE-SE ER+E YLSE MTSE-CTSE-WSE-FRTSE PNRTRSE ONPRSE WLD NCBE N WLD XLRCMSP NEWLD STS MEXL *ULMT * TUNSE NCBE ** ] [ (M*NSA*STEN MUNARSE) KLSE-LRSTE-TR SE-TRSE-M*SE *-MRSE (SAE*NSE SE N MRCE) ] [ NMNRCBRNSE PTE 2PTE WSR*B**** 36 MLSE 74SPRKS E 29KE NO*OLE 175 R*RSE 35 SLE CLGSE *UNUT*E *KRSE PSESHLE 651 MTCSE HTLSE NCUTCTRS NMRE 99.84.5 *UNEPLSE NCRSE AO*TSE N S*SE N* SE N5REONSE PVTSE WLD NCBE (JXOR*) ] [ *NMSE NRSE 1N2 NTRCE RCB*NSE NTSRCR*N LSPNSE N GSPSE MKSE R BSE N CBE *XL*R HM CRE N MRE NCBE 1/2 MUN D DLSE ] [ D-W-M14 *PL X*RLX ]

thinkalone 16y ago

Pretty cool - it definitely helps to read things better, although it actually resulted in me removing more characters from my transcription! After seeing them more clearly, I was less confident to make a judgment on which letter they may be. I'll include my transcription below. I've marked questionable characters with an asterisk, and the circled sections are enclosed in square brackets: Document 1 - P1 (MND MK NE* RSE-N-S-*-KNARE) (ACSM) *TFRNE NP*NSE NPBSE RCBBNSE NPRSE 1NC PRSE NM*SE *PREHLD WLDNCBE(TFXL* TCXL NCBE) AL-*RPPIT XLYPPIY NCBE M*KSEWCD RCBR NSE PRSE WLDRCBRNSE NT **NE*T*SE-CRSLE-CITRSE WLDNCBE ALWCPNCBETSME LRSE RLSE UR GLSNE AS N WLDNCBE (NOPFSE NLSRE NCBE) NTE GDDMNSENCURERCBRNE (TENE TFRNE NCBRTSENCBE 1NC) (FLRSE PRSE ONDE 71 NCBE) (CDNSE PRSE ONS*E 74 NCBE) (PR+SE PRSE ONREDE 75 NCBE) (TF N*CMSP SOLE MRDE LUSE TOTE WLD*WLDNCBE) (194 WLD'S NCBE)(TRFXL) Document 2 - NOTES [ ALPNTE GLSE-SE ER+E YLSE MTSE-CTSE-WSE-FRTSE PNRTRSE ONPRSE WLD NCBE N WLD XLRCMSP NEWLD STS MEXL *ULMT * TUNSE NCBE ** ] [ (M*NSA*STEN MUNARSE) KLSE-LRSTE-TR SE-TRSE-M*SE *-MRSE (SAE*NSE SE N MRCE) ] [ NMNRCBRNSE PTE 2PTE WSR*B**** 36 MLSE 74SPRKS E 29KE NO*OLE 175 R*RSE 35 SLE CLGSE *UNUT*E *KRSE PSESHLE 651 MTCSE HTLSE NCUTCTRS NMRE 99.84.5 *UNEPLSE NCRSE AO*TSE N S*SE N* SE N5REONSE PVTSE WLD NCBE (JXOR*) ] [ *NMSE NRSE 1N2 NTRCE RCB*NSE NTSRCR*N LSPNSE N GSPSE MKSE R BSE N CBE *XL*R HM CRE N MRE NCBE 1/2 MUN D DLSE ] [ D-W-M14 *PL X*RLX ]