4 ms·
I agree, it seems strange that the clause in the contract, which before must have been something along the lines of "$45.00 per referral, to a daily maximum of
by romey 16y ago
I agree, it seems strange that the clause in the contract, which before must have been something along the lines of "$45.00 per referral, to a daily maximum of $XX or 200 referrals..." has been changed to simply "NO LIMIT." Add to that the fact of how vague "NO LIMIT" as a statement is (perhaps he meant "NO, LIMIT"?) and the dubious authenticity of the actual purchases, and it seems strange to me that this was decided in favor of the affiliate.
- kragen 16y agoThe VP could have responded to "awesome!" with "I think you didn't understand me if you think that's awesome. I meant, 'NO, THERE IS A LIMIT.'" But he didn't.