3 ms·
So you're not going to allow explicit no-reply addresses. Then they'll just ignore all incoming mail to the sending address. Or are you going to require that al
by jpindar 6y ago
So you're not going to allow explicit no-reply addresses. Then they'll just ignore all incoming mail to the sending address. Or are you going to require that all businesses respond to all emails they receive? Will an automated response do?
- tinus_hn 6y agoIf you are government you can just say there needs to be an email address and reasonable requests to that address have to be responded to in a reasonable amount of time. The rest can be handled by the courts. It’s not that difficult, really.
- clusterfish 6y agoSuch vague laws are costly bullshit to everyone involved. How many times did you personally advance the legal precedent on your own dime to be so content with that approach?
- tinus_hn 6y agoThat’s the choice you make. You can either offer a working return address or you can waste your time and money ‘advancing the legal precedent’.
- clusterfish 6y agoI said you personally, that is, as a violated consumer suing a business. If you don't want to waste your own life fighting over your proposed vague law in court, you have no business to impose that on others. All too easy to propose a crap solution when it won't be you paying the price.
- tinus_hn 6y agoConsumers indeed have no business imposing laws on others. That’s the job of governments, as is enforcing laws.