The author is working very hard to build an indifference to the self into what is an emotional and psychological meaning to that phrase. Logic and language rule

The author is working very hard to build an indifference to the self into what is an emotional and psychological meaning to that phrase. Logic and language rules only get you so far removed from desires and romantic realities. I get these attempts are innocent from an american cultural perspective, but paul is not the next colbert. I never get tired of the internal contradictions people rely on to dismiss what is in front of their face. The start of this article declares that the phrase is meaningless and then ends with a fake revelation that the author has defined it's meaning. The author is so determined that the initial reaction is meaningless that we need to read three paragraphs about palming off nature to a language game. Bring back Steve Jobs.